1. TestRail
2. Tuskr
3. Xray
4. PractiTest
5. Testpad

Sup testers! If you’re like us, you want the best tools to make testing more accessible and efficient. We decided to check out 5 of the top Testlink alternatives this year. We’ll give you the full scoop on what we liked and didn’t like. Whether you’re a pro or just getting started, prepare for a deep dive into the best Testlink alternatives in 2023! Let’s do this!

Reasons to consider an alternative to Testlink

Considering alternative software testing solutions may be beneficial if one has been using Testlink. This is due to the potential for incompatibility with new technology, a difficult learning curve that could impede testing progress, and an outdated interface compared to more modern alternatives.

A brief overview of the five alternatives we will be comparing

After thorough research, we have identified five potential alternatives to Testlink. Each of these tools provides distinct features and advantages which could make them more suitable for the testing requirements of your team. Our comprehensive comparison will assess these tools according to usability, integrations, customization possibilities, cost, and more. At the end of our assessment, you should better understand which alternative(s) might be appropriate for your team. Let us now explore each of these five alternatives in detail.

Comparison Chart Of Top 5 Testlink Competitor

TOOL	Test case management	Test execution	Customizable dashboards	Integrations	Pricing
	Yes	Yes	Yes	JIRA, Selenium, others	Visit Website
	Yes	Yes	Yes	JIRA, TestRail	Visit Website
	Yes	Yes	Yes	JIRA, Jenkins, others	Visit Website
	Yes	Yes	Yes	JIRA, Selenium, others	Visit Website
	Yes	Yes	Yes	JIRA, Trello, others	Visit Website

Top 5 Testlink Alternatives

TestRail

TestRail is a popular test management tool that is trusted by thousands of teams around the world. It helps teams organize their testing efforts, from test case management to reporting, with an intuitive interface and robust features.

 TestRail is renowned for its user-friendly design and ease of use. It is simple to set up, enabling users to begin testing quickly. Furthermore, TestRail provides many customization options, allowing teams to customize workflows and dashboards according to their requirements.

About TestRail:

TestRail was founded in 2004 by Gurock Software and later acquired by Idera in 2016. The company has a reported valuation of $1 billion, with over 50 employees, as per Crunchbase. The founding team comprises Dennis Gurock, Florian Gurock, and Tobias Gurock.

Key Features:

TestRail offers a range of features that help teams manage their testing process, including:

• test case management
• test planning
• execution and reporting

TestRail is a comprehensive testing tool accessible from various devices, including phones, computers, and tablets. It facilitates easy testing in any location and integrates with tools like JIRA and Selenium. People love it – over 800 reviews with a 4.5-star rating found in capetrra and G2!

Testlink vs TestRail:

When looking at Testlink vs TestRail, it’s evident that TestRail has more to offer. It has a really cool user interface that makes testing more straightforward and faster. Plus, it has features like customizable dashboards and a mobile app that Testlink might need.

Pros of using TestRail:

• The user experience is made simple with a robust feature set
• Integration options and the ability to track progress reporting and identify areas for improvement. 
• Highly customizable enables teams to create workflows tailored to their specific needs.

Cons of using TestRail:

• The cost might be too much for small groups or people with little money. 
• Some may think the reports must be more detailed than other complex programs.

Pricing

Try TestRail

Our review of TestRail:

TestRail is a widely utilized test management tool that enables teams to expedite and optimize their testing process. It features a user-friendly interface, customizable workflows, and numerous capabilities, thereby making it popular among teams globally.

Alternatives to TestRail 

Tuskr

Tuskr is a test management tool that makes testing easier and helps teams work together better. It has many features to help you manage your testing, like keeping track of test cases and creating reports.

About Tuskr:

Tuskr is an excellent tool for testers! It features a user-friendly design that facilitates the creation, execution, and management of tests. Additionally, it integrates with popular applications such as JIRA and Slack to promote collaboration among team members. It was started in 2018 by some brilliant software developers and testers, and now they’re worth a whopping $10 million, according to Crunchbase!

Key Features

Tuskr has tons of cool features that make it easy to use for both people and groups, no matter what type of device you’re using (phone, web, or computer). Plus, it works with popular platforms like JIRA and Slack. It’s really popular too – it has over 50 reviews on G2 and Capterra, with an average rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars!

Testlink vs Tuskr:

When looking at Testlink vs Tuskr, it’s evident that Tuskr has some great features. Its user-friendly interface allows users to begin testing immediately. Additionally, its integration options facilitate collaboration and communication among teams.

Pros of using Tuskr:

• Tuskr is an excellent tool for all types of groups! 
• It’s super user-friendly, so you can get going fast. 
• It helps you work together with your squad, like collaborating and personalizing how things get done. 
• Tuskr is affordable, so even smaller or medium-sized teams can use it without spending too much money!

Cons of using Tuskr:

• The reporting features might be better than other tools out there.

Pricing

Try Tuskr

Our review of Tuskr:

An analysis of Tuskr showed that it can make testing a lot easier for teams. It has cool features like apps for phones and computers, and works with other popular tools. If you’re looking for an easy way to manage, test and share info with your team, then Tuskr is worth checking out!

Xray

Xray is a comprehensive solution for testers to organize, plan and track their tests. It features numerous capabilities that enable users to monitor testing progress and ensure accuracy. Software developers utilize Xray to optimize the quality of their products before release. Additionally, it facilitates the identification of any potential issues so they can be addressed promptly.

About Xray:

Established in 2013, Xray is based in Portugal and has approximately 100 employees. To date, the company has raised $3M in funding.

Key Features

Test Case Management, Test Plan Management, Requirements Management, and Test Execution Management are all offered by this software. It also integrates with JIRA, Jenkins, Bamboo, and many more. Mobile app and desktop app options are available. This software has been rated 4.8 out of 5 stars on Capterra with over 300 reviews.

Testlink vs Xray:

Xray provides a more comprehensive set of features, including requirements management, test plan management, and integrations with various tools which are not available in Testlink. Additionally, Xray offers a more intuitive user interface. However, Testlink is open-source and free to use, while Xray requires a license to access its services.

Pros of using Xray:

• Advanced test management capabilities
• seamless integration with other tools
• mobile and desktop app options
• excellent customer support

Cons of using Xray:

• might not be ideal for smaller teams

Pricing

Try Xray

Our review of Xray:

Xray is a super helpful and efficient tool for managing testing activities. This is one of the best Testlink Alternatives you should check out for streamlined Jira Test Management, a reliable and effective solution for software development teams to keep track of their tests. It is highly recommended and worth the cost.

PractiTest

PractiTest is a customizable testing tool that simplifies testing by offering features such as creating test cases and generating reports. It integrates with popular tools such as JIRA and Selenium, allowing for better collaboration between team members.

About PractiTest:

Founded in 2009, PractiTest is based in Israel and has a reported valuation of $30 million, as indicated by Crunchbase.

Key Features

PractiTest offers mobile, web, and desktop applications for users to access testing tools from any location. This product can be integrated with JIRA, Selenium, and other CI/CD pipelines and has received positive reviews on G2 and Capterra, with an average rating of 4.6 stars out of 5 from over 200 people.

Testlink vs PractiTest:

When comparing Testlink and PractiTest, it is evident that PractiTest offers a variety of advantageous features. It is highly customizable, allowing users to tailor the system to their team’s requirements. Furthermore, its compatibility with other tools facilitates collaboration and helps ensure everyone remains in sync.

Pros of using PractiTest:

• The remarkable thing about PractiTest is that it’s flexible and customizable, so you can make it work for your team, big or small. 
• Plus, you get a lot of enterprise-level features for a reasonable price!

Cons of using PractiTest:

• Some people find the UI confusing and hard to learn.

Pricing

Try PractiTest

Our review of PractiTest:

Our review of PractiTest found that it’s a fantastic and adjustable test management tool that can help teams make their testing process faster and better.

It has many features, like mobile and desktop app choices and the ability to connect with popular tools, so PractiTest is excellent for teams who want to customize their testing workflows for their needs.

Testpad

Testpad is a useful tool that facilitates testing for teams. TestRail has been created to simplify the testing process and improve the experience. Its user-friendly interface allows users to create test cases, manage tests and monitor progress quickly. Furthermore, TestRail provides additional benefits such as integration with other tools, collaborative functionality, and rapid reporting.

About Testpad:

Established in 2013, the headquarters of this company is located in London, UK. Information regarding valuation and employee numbers is private.

Key features

This company provides mobile, web, and desktop software applications that can be integrated with popular tools such as JIRA, Slack, Trello, and Asana. It has received a 5-star rating on Capterra with over 40 reviews.

Testlink vs Testpad:

 Testpad is a lot easier to use than Testlink. It has a straightforward interface makes it super simple to create, organize and manage tests. Testpad offers more advanced features like better integrations, collaboration tools, and reporting options.

Pros of using Testpad:

• The interface is designed to be user-friendly, allowing for easy collaboration between team members. 
• It integrates with other tools and provides customizable test reports accessible on multiple platforms.

Cons of using Testpad:

• The features available are limited for larger organizations, and customization options are restricted.

Pricing

Try Testpad

Our review of Testpad:

Testpad is suitable for small to medium-sized teams seeking an intuitive test management system. It provides a range of features, integrations, and user-friendliness that can facilitate the testing process and improve outcomes.

On the other hand, larger organizations may find Testpad’s limited customization options and features need to be improved. In conclusion, Testpad is a dependable and effective tool for test management. Undoubtedly it is one of the best Testlink alternatives out there.

Frequently Asked Questions – FAQs

What is similar to Testlink?

Testlink is a tool that helps you plan, organize, and track your software testing. It gives you an easy way to create, manage and monitor test cases and report on the results. You can also connect it with bug-tracking systems and project management tools. If you don’t want to use Testlink, other Testlink alternatives like Zephyr, PractiTest, Xray, and Testpad can replace them.

What are the disadvantages of TestLink?

One of the main disadvantages of Testlink is its outdated user interface. The look and feel of the application last updated a few years ago, making it difficult to use for modern users who are accustomed to more modern interfaces.

Additionally, Testlink offers limited reporting capabilities compared to other test management tools. This makes it difficult to accurately understand your project’s progress or assess how well your team is performing.

Finally, Testlink doesn’t offer any integration with other tools or services, limiting its usefulness in larger organizations with multiple tools.

Is Testlink a free tool?

Yes, Testlink is a free and easy-to-use tool that helps you manage the testing process. You can use it to design tests, assign them to people who will be doing the testing, track any issues that come up during the process, and generate reports.

It’s super user friendly so you won’t have any trouble finding your way around it. Plus, if you’re already using other tools like Bugzilla or Jira for bug tracking, Testlink integrates with them for an even smoother experience.

Conclusion

To sum it up, Consider the features, cost, and user experience of each Testlink Alternatives. While selecting a test management tool, take into account its customizability, affordability, support, and ease of interaction with other products.

Making ensuring that everyone on the team is trained on how to use the tool correctly and to keep up with any changes or updates is also crucial. The correct test management tool can help teams create better software faster and more efficiently.

TestRail, Tuskr, Xray, PractiTest, and Testpad all offer different features that make them great options instead of Testlink. Check these Testlink alternatives out and find the one that will work best for your team’s workflow – this will help make testing more productive and successful.

Read More Alternative:

7 Best Puppeteer Alternatives

10 Best Appium Alternatives

10 Best SauceLabs Alternatives

The post We Tried 5 Best Testlink Alternatives  [In-Depth Comparison 2024] appeared first on Software Testing Stuff.

Here is the list of 10 alternatives to Postman that will definitely fulfill all the desires that you lack with Postman. They are as follows:

• Sauce Labs
• Swagger UI
• Soap UI
• Insomnia
• Paw
• Thunder Client
• Katalon Studio

When it comes to APIs, Postman is a popular API development and testing tool that is widely used by developers to create, test, and manage APIs. There are many advantages for which some might consider Postman to be the best-suited tool.

Starting from various testing capabilities, collaboration, automation, and the ability to access a user-friendly interface, Postman makes it easy for developers to use different APIs for their applications.

But, apart from that, Postman must need a premium subscription to access all the customized features which can be costly. Additionally, the integrated tools aren’t up to the mark and the interface provides complexity sometimes.

Hence, for such reasons, some must consider suitable Postman API testing alternatives. In this article, I will show you my intensive research that might take out the hassle of deciding between different API testing tools.

Reasons To Consider An Alternative To Postman

As mentioned earlier, some core drawbacks let me find some Postman competitors. They are as follows:

• Cost In-effective: Postman has a free version with basic features, but some of the advanced features such as API monitoring, team collaboration, and integrations require a paid subscription. Some users may find the cost of Postman too high and may be looking for a more affordable alternative.
• Complexity: Postman is a powerful tool with a lot of features, which may be overwhelming for some users. But for non-technical developers, a simpler and more intuitive tool will be much preferable.
• Limitations in platform support: Postman is primarily designed for testing and development on web-based APIs. While it does support other platforms like mobile app testing, it may not be the tool for such applications.
• Limitations in open source: Some developers prefer open-source tools, which can be more customizable and offer more control. Though Postman has a free version, the included features are considered very negligible to use.
• Limitations in integrations: Integration mainly increases testing efficiency. Therefore, some developers may prefer Postman alternatives that integrate better with their existing development workflow or toolset.

Brief Overview Of The 7 Alternatives We Will Be Comparing

After a careful analysis of each of the tools individually, I’ve narrowed it down to the 7 best Postman alternatives that’ll provide satisfied service to the developers. The list is as follows:

1. Sauce Labs – Best comprehensive cloud-based testing tool.
2. Swagger UI – Best open-source API testing tool.
3. Soap UI – Best for data-driven testing and integrations.
4. Insomnia – Best for Windows, Mac, and Linux operating systems.
5. Paw – Best MacOS user API testing tool.
6. Thunder Client – Best lightweight API testing tool.
7. Katalon Studio – Best comprehensive testing tool.
8. Apigee Edge – Best tool for API management.
9. Testim – Best for website application testing (also suitable on any operating system).
10. SmartBear – Best for operating under any programming language.

The Application Program Interface (API) aims to build the ideal environment for a certain piece of software or mobile application to meet all requirements, including excellent performance, zero errors, and complete security.

API testing, to put it simply, makes sure that each tested software component can communicate according to the commands. As a result, an API testing tool must have attributes like an effective test analysis presentation, trustworthy third-party integration tools, and the ability to give developers control over customized settings.

Additionally, apart from API testing, a tool also needs to have other testing features such as mobile, and website application testing. This can provide a development tool with all the comprehensive test cases developers will need for their projects.

The table below shows a fair comparison of all the tools mentioned above so that you can have a generalized idea before looking at all the tool’s features individually.

Comparison Chart Of Top 7 Postman Competitors

TOOL	Types of application testing	Supported platforms	Programming languages	Ratings And Reviews (G2)	Pricing
	Website, mobile, desktop, laptop	iOS, Android, Windows	Java, JavaScript, Appium (third-party), Selenium (third-party)	4.5/5 (131 reviews)	Visit Website
	API	iOS, Android, Windows	HTML, CSS, and Java Script	4.5/5 (34 reviews)	Visit Website
	Website, mobile, API	iOS, Android	Java, Groovy	4.5/5 (128 reviews)	Visit Website
	API	iOS, Android, Windows, Linux	Java Script	4/5 (4 reviews)	Visit Website
	API	MacOS	Java Script	4.5/5 (6 reviews)	Visit Website
	API	iOS, Android, Windows	VScode (Script Editor)	4.5/5 (15 reviews)	Visit Website
	Website, mobile, API, desktop, laptop	iOS, Android, Windows	Java, JavaScript, Groovy	4.5/5 (44 reviews)	Visit Website

Top 10 Postman Alternatives

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs is a different cloud-platform application testing tool that offers quick and effective test cases for websites and mobile applications.

Using Sauce Labs gives you numerous benefits, including the ability to test applications across various real-world platforms, including mobile, desktop, and numerous browsers. These platforms supported by Sauce Labs include Android, Windows, and iOS.

Additionally, it can do both manual and automated tests. You can use a variety of third-party integrations, such as Appium, Selenium, or Java Script, where you can write all the codes and create unique test cases when performing automation testing.

About Sauce Labs

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding Sauce Labs:

• The founder of Sauce Labs is Jason Huggins.
• The current CEO is Aled Miles
• The head office is located in San Francisco, California, United States.
• Founded in 2008.
• Comprises a maximum of 500 employees.

Key Features:

Cross-Browser Testing: Developers can evaluate browser compatibility using Sauce Labs’ cross-browser testing capability. The program will be more resilient with more compatibility, even with the older models of browsers.

Automated API Testing: Sauce Labs provides you with automated API testing and UI/visual testing that enables the developers to figure out the bugs quickly inside the system. Moreover, you can also understand how changing the codes impacts the UI.

Manual Testing: Sauce Labs offers real-time device testing on laptops, desktops, and mobile devices, allowing users to find problems and fix them without any prior knowledge of automation.

Integrations: In addition to the standard integration methods, Sauce Labs also provides a total of 8 integration techniques like Jenkins and Bamboo to boost testing effectiveness and create a better workflow when troubleshooting issues.

Ratings and Reviews: G2 (4.3/5, 131 reviews), Capterra (4.4/5, 29 reviews)

Postman vs. Sauce Labs

Postman is primarily a tool for testing APIs, allowing users to send HTTP requests to an API and verify the responses. It offers a user-friendly interface, support for multiple protocols, and the ability to automate API testing with scripts.

On the other hand, Sauce Labs is a cloud-based platform for testing web and mobile applications across multiple platforms, browsers, and devices. It offers a range of features such as automated testing, manual testing, and real-device testing, and supports a variety of frameworks and programming languages.

Therefore, if you want a tool that provides a comprehensive structure for all kinds of test cases, I’ll recommend Sauce Labs over Postman.

Pros:

• Sauce Labs provides a comprehensive testing environment for the developers that includes a website, mobile applications, or API tests.
• It also supports multiple browsers to increase the robustness of the projects.
• Being a cloud-based platform, it offers the user to work from a remote location and access to the project.

Cons:

• The premium packages are a bit expensive to afford for all developers.
• The cloud-based working environment raises a lot of security issues.

Pricing

Try Sauce Labs

Our Review of Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs is a highly dependable tool for testing both mobile devices and web applications, depending on its performance. For both real-time and graphical interpretation, the integration methods produce even better results.

In addition, Sauce Labs offers excellent customer service and community support. Some users claim that the free trial version doesn’t include all the customized features and that the premium packages are costly in comparison to their project work.

Therefore, despite this issue, I can without a doubt recommend Sauce Labs as a Postman alternative open source for your project.

Alternatives to SauceLabs

Swagger UI

Are you not satisfied with an API development tool yet? Hold on! Swagger UI is an open-source tool that allows developers to design, build, document, and test RESTful APIs. It provides a web-based interface that allows users to interact with the API and understand how it works without having to read the code.

One of the main benefits of Swagger UI is that it allows developers to easily document their API endpoints. By simply adding annotations to their code, developers can automatically generate documentation that is both comprehensive and easy to read.

About Swagger UI

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding Swagger Ui:

• The founders of Swagger UI are Stacy Takeuchi and Tony Ram.
• The current CEO is Stacy Takeuchi.
• The head office is located in Somerville, Massachusetts, United States.
• Founded in 2014.
• Comprises a maximum of 10 employees.

Key Features

API Documentation: Swagger UI generates documentation for your API based on its OpenAPI specification (formerly known as Swagger specification). This documentation includes information about the API endpoints, parameters, request and response schemas, and many more.

API Testing Process: Swagger UI allows users to interact with their API directly from the UI. Users can input values for different parameters and see the results in real time. This makes it easy to test and debug APIs without leaving the Swagger UI.

API Virtualization: Swagger UI provides a virtual representation of the API endpoints and how they relate to each other. This makes it easier for developers to understand the API structure and design.

Integration Techniques: Swagger UI includes the integration with SmartBear with manual infrastructural complexity such as Pact Flow, ReadyAPI, and many more. Additionally, there’re many third-party tools such as AWS, apigee, Bitbucket, and GitHub.

Ratings and Reviews: G2 (4.5/5, 34 reviews), Capterra (4.5/5, 15 reviews)

Postman vs. Swagger UI

Postman offers a more user-friendly interface for testing APIs, with features such as pre-built requests, request history, and environment variables. Swagger UI, on the other hand, offers a more visual interface for exploring and interacting with API documentation.

Swagger UI offers more customization options for API documentation, allowing you to tailor the documentation to your organization’s branding and design. Postman also offers some customization options, but they are more limited.

In terms of cost, both Postman and Swagger UI provide a free and paid version which allows all types of developers to habituate themselves with the tool. Therefore, depending on the requirement of your projects, choose the most suitable one!

Pros:

• Swagger UI provides a user-friendly interface for creating and testing APIs, which makes it easy for developers to understand and interact with APIs.
• It allows direct API testing from the UI which saves a lot of time.
• It allows the developers to generate client code according to their preferred programming language.
• Swagger UI is an open-source tool.

Cons :

• For RestFuL APIs, the user might have to face preliminary difficulties in operating.

Pricing

Try Swagger UI

Our Review of Swagger UI

For technical developers, the interface is said to be extremely user-friendly and each feature produces efficient results for API testing. But, in the case of non-technical users, this particular tool might need a steep learning curve.

Therefore, I’d recommend the developers of Swagger UI to concentrate on this issue to figure out some automated way to make it easy for non-technical users.

Best Swagger alternatives

Soap UI

SoapUI, the third item on our list, is known as the ideal tool for testing SOAP web services. In simpler terms, it specializes in testing both mobile apps and web applications in addition to API testing.

SoapUI supports data-driven tests in addition to API testing, allowing developers to enter various data sets and have the API testing produce results according to those inputs. This provides an opportunity for further growth while also assisting the app developers in identifying various bugs that may exist within the application.

The fact that SoapUI is an open-source API development tool that enables both technical and non-technical developers to quickly become accustomed to the interface. And, for this particular advantage, it is one of the most common tools for application and API testing.

About Soap UI

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding SoapUI:

• The owner of SoapUI is Smartbear Software, originally founded by Eviware Software.
• The current CEO is Frank Roe.
• The head office is located in Massachusetts, United States.
• Founded in 2005.
• Comprises a maximum of 30 employees.

Key Features

Advanced Test Cases: Advanced test cases for SoapUI additionally include complicated API testing, data-driven tests, scripting, and many others. The developers can easily script these test scenarios and can then replicate them to lay out the debugs.

Automation: The user of SoapUI can automate certain API tasks to save time and effort. To speed up automation even more, it also uses continuous integration and delivery methods.

Data-Driven Technology: To simulate the data-driven feature, developers can input different parameters during API testing.

Integrations: To increase testing efficiency with no lags, SoapUI supports various third-party tools such as JIRA, Jenkins, and Git to ensure faster access. Moreover, it also supports API formats, for example, WSDL, Swagger, and RAML.

Ratings and Reviews: G2 (4.5 / 5, 128 reviews), Capterra (4.5 / 5, 162 reviews).

Postman vs. Soap UI

Postman is a user-friendly API testing tool that offers a comprehensive set of features for designing, testing, and documenting APIs. Its intuitive interface allows users to easily create requests, add headers, and view responses.

On the other hand, SoapUI is a more specialized tool designed specifically for testing SOAP and REST APIs. It includes advanced features such as data-driven testing, load testing, and support for various authentication protocols. This makes it a great choice for testing complex APIs with a high degree of customization and control.

Therefore, for more options and features, Soap UI will be a great alternative to Postman.

Pros :

• SoapUI also functions as a thorough API testing tool for desktop or mobile applications.
• This specific tool is simple to use for coding.
• It functions as an open-source tool for developers and offers continuous integration and development methodologies.
• The interface is user-friendly and simple for non-technical users to learn.

Cons:

• The simulations of the test runs may provide occasional lag.

Pricing

Try Soap UI

Our Review of Soap UI

SoapUI is the ideal tool to write test cases for API testing. Regardless of the application type you select, the test cases will produce valid results from two or three distinct systems to take compatibility into account.

The tool’s open-source nature, which enables non-technical users to learn about its functioning and the creation of test cases, is its most significant feature. The interface is very easy to use for technical users.

Soap UI competitors for performing tests

Insomnia

Another API tool is known as Insomnia! It is an open-source REST API client tool that allows developers to test and debug HTTP/HTTPS APIs. It is available for Windows, Mac, and Linux operating systems and offers a user-friendly interface that makes it easy to create and send API requests.

About Insomnia

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding Insomnia:

• The founder of Insomnia is Gregory Schier.
• The current CEO is Gregory Schier.

Key Features

API Structure: Insomnia saves the response history of each API request, allowing developers to easily compare and debug responses.

Collaboration: Insomnia offers collaboration features, including version control, shared environments, and team libraries.

Automated API Testing: Insomnia supports automated testing using test suites and assertions, allowing developers to test OpenAPIs programmatically.

Integrations: Insomnia includes integrations such as GitHub, and CI/CD tools to increase testing efficiency.

Ratings and Reviews: G2 (4.9/5, 4 reviews)

Postman vs. Insomnia

Both tools offer user-friendly interfaces, but Postman has a more polished and streamlined interface with more advanced features. Insomnia’s interface is simpler and easier to navigate, making it a good choice for beginners.

Furthermore, Postman and Insomnia both offer free versions with limited features. However, Postman’s paid plans are more expensive than Insomnia for free users.

As for the integration, Postman offers more flexibility to improve testing efficiency. Therefore, I think Postman will be a better choice than Insomnia.

Pros:

• It has a user-friendly interface.
• It is available for Windows, Mac, and Linux operating systems.
• It is an open-source tool.

Cons :

• It has a limited number of integrations.

Pricing

Try Insomnia

Our Review of Insomnia

Insomnia is a powerful and user-friendly API validation tool. It offers a range of features that make it an excellent choice for developers and teams of all sizes. Most importantly, it supports operating systems like Windows, Mac, and Linux.

But, in the case of integrations, I have to rely on other API development tools which is a real drawback for insomnia being API service providers.

Top Alternatives Of Insomnia

Paw

Paw is a powerful REST API client, designed specifically for Mac. It is a user-friendly tool that simplifies the process of building and testing RESTful APIs. Paw is commonly used by developers, product managers, and designers to streamline their API development workflows.

Paw allows users to create API requests using a visual interface, rather than writing code manually. This makes it easy for users with little or no coding experience to create and test API requests.

About Paw

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding Paw:

• The founder and current CEO of Paw is Micha Mazaheri.
• The head office is located in Tallinn, Harjumaa, Estonia.
• Founded in 2014.
• Comprises a maximum of 10 employees.

Key features

Collaboration and Integrations: Paw integrates with various collaboration tools, such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and Slack, making it easy to work with team members.

Automated Testing: Paw supports automated testing and sends HTTP requests, which allows users to create test suites and automate API testing.

Ratings and Reviews: G2 (4.6/5, 6 reviews)

Postman vs. Paw

Postman is a cross-platform tool that is available for Windows, Mac, and Linux. It has a large community of users and offers many advanced features such as automated testing, team collaboration, and cloud hosting. Postman is also known for its user-friendly interface and easy-to-use documentation.

On the other hand, Paw is a Mac-specific tool that offers a visual interface for building and testing APIs. It supports dynamic values and environment variables and allows users to generate code snippets in various programming languages. Paw is also known for its sleek and intuitive interface, making it easy to use for users with little or no coding experience.

Though Postman has the upper hand in terms of features, when it comes to Mac developers, Paw will be the best alternative to postman!

Pros

• It has a user-friendly interface.
• It provides smooth integration with tools like Slack, Bitbucket, and many more.
• It can generate code in many coding languages.

Cons:

• Paw is a free tool for single-person users (the price is high for multiple users).

Pricing

Try Paw

Our Review of Paw

Paw’s user interface is one of its biggest strengths. It has a clean and modern design that makes it easy to navigate, and the interface is customizable, allowing users to add or remove elements as needed.

Additionally, the integration systems provide a satisfying testing efficiency for the developers. As this tool is only suitable for Mac users, it’ll have a limited number of users which, in my sense, needs modification.

Thunder Client

Thunder Client is a lightweight, open-source REST API client for Visual Studio Code, a popular code editor. It provides developers with a simple and intuitive interface to send HTTP requests and test REST APIs directly to web clients from within their editor.

Thunder Client offers a range of features, including support for multiple environments, code snippets, automatic formatting of request and response bodies, and request history. It also includes a real-time response viewer, making it easy for developers to debug and troubleshoot their API requests.

About Thunder Client

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding Thunder Client:

• The founder and current CEO of Thunder Client is Ranga Vadhineni.
• The head office is located in Dublin, Ireland.
• Founded in 2021.
• Comprises a maximum of 10 employees.

Key features

Lightweight: As mentioned earlier, Thunder Client is a lightweight tool that is easy to install and simple to operate.

Integrations: Thunder Client integrates with VScode to improve the API testing efficiency.

Ratings and Reviews: G2 (4.3/5, 15 reviews)

Postman vs. Thunder Client

Thunder Client is easy to install and use, and its features include support for multiple environments, code snippets, and request history. Thunder Client also offers real-time response viewing, making it easy to debug and troubleshoot API requests (visual studio code extension).

On the other hand, Postman is a more comprehensive public API and testing tool that offers a wide range of features, including automated testing, mock servers, and collaboration tools. It’s also highly extensible, with support for popular programming languages and frameworks.

Therefore, both tools specialize in API frameworks and the choice will depend upon you to choose the most suitable one for your project works.

Pros

• It’s a lightweight restAPI tool.
• It provides VScode integrations.
• Simple user-friendly interface.
• It views real response time.

Cons

• It doesn’t have any advanced features.

Pricing

Try Thunder Client

Our Review of Thunder Client

Many developers have praised Thunder Client for its simplicity, ease of use, and integration with Visual Studio Code. The real-time response viewer and support for multiple environments have also been noted as useful features for developers.

As the tool is new, it has certain areas that still need developing such as more third-party tools access for integrations or other types of application testing to account for a comprehensive testing tool.

Katalon Studio

If you wish to conduct API testing in addition to other kinds of testing, Katalon is the ideal alternative to Postman. Katalon includes all kinds of testing tools such as a desktop app, mobile, API, and website applications.

Using programming languages like Java, Groovy, or Python, Katalon provides a far more user-friendly interface. Furthermore, even users with no programming experience can create test cases using the built-in keywords from Katalon’s libraries.

Katalon provides a range of testing options, including functional testing, regression testing, mobile testing, and more. Several software developers in the field of automation testing became familiar with Katalon thanks to its various testing variations.

About Katalon Studio

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding Katalon:

• The founder of Katalon is Vu Lam
• The co-founder of Katalon is Uy Tran.
• The current CEO is Vu Lam.
• The head office is located in Atlanta, Georgia, and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
• Founded in 2015.
• Comprises a maximum of 500 employees.

Key features

Website testing: Katalon offers a variety of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge for adaptable website testing. You can use libraries or write your own code to implement testing techniques on these browsers.

Mobile Testing: Testing of mobile applications is another option available to Katalon. As a result, the user can create the application using any third-party software and then test it using Katalon.

API testing: The most exciting aspect of Katalon is its capacity for API testing. Moreover, it supports assertions, allows for data-driven testing, and most crucially, it verifies the API response.

Desktop testing: Windows and macOS are among the operating systems that Katalon supports. It also aids users in conducting website application testing.

Integrations: 50 distinct types of integration tools are available in Katalon. Jira, Selenium, SoapUI, Jenkins, BrowserStack, and many other well-known tools are just a few.

Ratings and Reviews: G2 (4.5 / 5, 44 reviews), Capterra (4.4 / 5, 702 reviews).

Postman vs. Katalon Studio

Postman is primarily designed for testing RESTful APIs and offers an easy-to-use interface for creating, testing, and documenting APIs. It offers a wide range of features, including automated testing, mock servers, and collaboration tools, making it a great choice for developers, testers, and teams of all sizes.

Katalon is a more comprehensive testing solution that includes both API and UI testing capabilities. It offers a range of features for test automation, including record-and-playback, test case management, and integration with popular testing frameworks.

Though Katalon doesn’t involve API development, if you need a comprehensive tool, you can definitely choose it over Postman. To focus more on API management tools, Postman will be a better pick!

Pros

• The interface is user-friendly.
• Katalon is a cloud-based platform that provides the benefit of working from a remote location.
• It doesn’t require significant coding knowledge.
• It includes advanced integrations like JIRA and Testrail to increase testing efficiency.

Cons

• Katalon isn’t associated with API management or development.

Pricing

Try Katalon Studio

Our Review of Katalon Studio

The most exciting feature of Katalon is that it has a variety of advanced test cases, including playback choices and test recordings. Being a cloud-based platform also lessens the workload.

But, Katalon’s inbuilt API development tool functionality requires some adjustments. If this area is given more attention, nobody will surpass Katalon.

Katalon alternatives for app testing

Frequently Asked Questions – FAQs

Can Postman Be Automated?

Yes, Postman can be automated using scripts and integrations with other tools. Postman offers a scripting feature called “Postman Scripts” that allows users to write JavaScript code to automate API tests and workflows.

You can also perform tasks such as data extraction, test assertion, response validation, and many more. Additionally, a developer can also add individual requests, folders, or collections to automate API testing for their projects.

What are the reasons for Insomnia becoming an alternative to Postman?

Insomnia offers a user-friendly interface, support for GraphQL, WebSocket protocols, and desktop application testing. It also offers a free and open-source version with all features included. On the other hand, Postman does come with amazing features for API testing, but it requires a premium subscription which is costly.

What are the benefits of using Soap UI over Postman?

SoapUI offers advanced features such as data-driven testing, security testing, and API simulation. It also supports SOAP and REST protocols, making it a versatile tool for testing APIs. Additionally, you can also use Soap UI to make test scripts for different websites or mobile applications, and not to mention, it comes with a satisfactory free trial version, unlike Postman.

Conclusion

Though each tool focuses mainly on API development and management, some provide versatile performance such as Katalon. In case you’re a Mac user, you can always shift to Paw for your API-related tests. But, according to my research, Katalon seems to be the best alternative to Postman.

Also Read

Appium competitors for app testing

Competitors Tot CircleCI

The post We tried 10 Best Postman Alternatives: [In-Depth Comparison 2024] appeared first on Software Testing Stuff.

Here is a quick list of the 10 alternatives to Insomnia that we’ve rounded up:

1. Postman
2. Soap UI
3. Katalon
4. Testsigma
5. Testim
6. REST-assured
7. Cypress
8. Karate
9. JMeter
10. Hoppscotch

The tech world needs a specialized tool for testing software or mobile applications for compatibility in a different server environment. A set of valid test results give developers certain room for modifications in the software applications.

When it comes to API testing, Insomnia has been taking the lead with its various features capable of handling multiple environments, API management, and Code generation.

But, there are certain drawbacks for which Insomnia might not be the perfect API testing tool. Such drawbacks include limitations in report testing, integrated tools, community support and not to mention, and the cost of bearing premium packages.

Therefore, we took the matter into our own hands and performed intensive research to find out the 10 best alternatives to Insomnia. The details are as follows!

Reasons to consider an alternative to Insomnia

As we’ve already mentioned, Insomnia is a great tool for API testing on your software or mobile applications. With the ability to work on multiple environments, they allow the developers to switch between various API endpoints and databases without any hassle.

But, with advantages, one should also think about the disadvantages and Insomnia has some significant cases to think of an alternative. They’re as follows:

• Limitations to Report Testing and Analysis: Insomnia produces significant limitations to report testing and analysis. For customization, one must get their premium packages. This makes the API testing for the developers less efficient.
• Limitations in Integration Techniques: Though Insomnia allows different integrated tools for greater testing efficiency, there are certain third-party tools some organization prefers and unfortunately, they’re excluded from Insomnia’s plan.
• Limitations in Community Support: The community background of Insomnia isn’t strong. If any developer faces a complex problem, they might not get a precise solution relying on community support.
•  Inefficient in terms of Cost: Insomnia offers customization if any developer buys access to their premium packages. But, the subscription charges are high which makes it non-affordable for some developers.

A brief overview of the 5 alternatives we will be comparing

Here are top 5 list of the best alternatives to Insomnia:
● Postman
● Soap UI
● Katalon
● Testsigma
● Testim

The Application Program Interface (API) tries to create a perfect room for a certain software or mobile application to fulfill every demand such as top-notch performance, no bugs, or no security issues of any kind.

In simpler terms, API testing ensures that every tested software component can communicate according to the commands made. Therefore, an API testing tool must-have features like a good presentation of test analysis, reliable third-party integration tools, and providing freedom to developers for customized settings.

With that being said, let’s look at a fair comparison between the tools mentioned above and make a decision about which tool will be most suitable for versatile testing tasks.

Comparison Chart Of Top 5 Insomnia Competitor

TOOL	Types of application testing	Supported platforms	Programming languages	Cloud-based infrastructure	Pricing
	API	iOS, Android	GUI-based tool for API development	Yes	Visit Website
	Mobile	iOS, Andriod, Windows	Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, TypeScript	Yes	Visit Website
	Website, mobile, API, desktop	iOS, Andriod, Windows	Java, JavaScript, Groovy	No	Visit Website
	Website, mobile, API	iOS, Andriod	Java, Groovy	Yes	Visit Website
	Website	Works on any operating system available	JavaScript, TypeScript, Python	Yes	Visit Website

5 Best Insomnia Alternatives

Postman

Postman is a well-known API development tool that focuses on building, monitoring, and producing fine test results in API testing. This tool allows the developer to work in multiple environments with numerous integration techniques.

Additionally, Postman offers team collaboration that allows a group of developers to share their workspaces, and resources to finish a software testing task as soon as possible.

The most attractive thing about Postman is that is a command line interface- Newman. This interface allows the test to run on CI/CD pipelines as a part of the building process. It additionally generates more accurate results with visual reports for analysis.

About Postman:

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding Postman:

• The founder of Postman is Abhinav Asthana.
• The current CEO is Abhinav Asthana.
• The head offices are located in San Francisco and Bangalore.
• Founded in 2012.
• Comprises a maximum of 1000 employees.

Key Features:

API Testing: Postman provides comprehensive API testing facilities that enable developers to easily generate automated testing, figure out bugs, and fix them accordingly. Moreover, the API tests are suitable for both software and mobile applications.

API Documentation: Postman allows their user to share their API documentation with other developers for smooth interpretation. The API documentation is available in many formats such as OpenAPI and RAML.

Integration Techniques: Postman offers various third-party tools for improving testing efficiency. Such tools include GitHub, Slack, and JIRA.

Automation: Postman also includes an automation feature by adding customized scripts into the interface. The programming language for the scripts is JavaScript which makes it easy for the developers to develop and customize their scripts according to their projects.

Postman vs. Insomnia:

Both Postman and Insomnia are considered popular API development tools but the choices will depend upon the requirement of certain projects. If your project needs API documentation, a user-friendly interface, a collaboration feature, and writing customized scripts, then choosing Postman will be perfect for you.

On the other hand, Insomnia is almost identical to Postman, but the community support isn’t up to the mark. Additionally, if you need to customize your test cases, one must have premium packages installed which is costly.

In terms of API testing, the results provided by Insomnia are less efficient. Therefore, whether it’s a mobile or software application, the Postman API development tool will be a perfect fit.

Pros:

• It allows a comprehensive set for API testing.
• A user-friendly interface.
• It enables coding on JavaScript for customizations.
• It includes various integration techniques.
• The community of Postman is large.
• It also allows automation testing.

Cons:

• As it requires JavaScript coding, it might be difficult to operate for non-technical users.

Pricing

Try Postman

Our review of Postman:

While using the API advantages of Postman, the ease of use, support quality, and setup procedure are quite satisfactory. On top of that, the automation feature of this API development tool is the most attractive part.

Being able to share the workspaces with other developers eases the testing tasks, thanks to the collaboration feature of Postman. On the other hand, the customization option allows the developers to add top-notch test cases for their software.

But, as the programming language is JavaScript only, it might exclude amateur developers. In our sense, the developers of Postman should include some other simpler programming languages such as Python to increase access.

Top Alternatives Of Postman

SoapUI

The second on our list is SoapUI, which is known as the perfect tool for testing SOAP web services. In simpler terms, along with API testing, it is specialized in both mobile and website application testing.

Along with API testing, SoapUI also allows data-driven tests which means that the developers can input different data sets and the API testing will generate the results accordingly. This helps the developers to figure out different bugs inside the application and also creates room for more development.

One major advantage of SoapUI is that it’s an open-source API development tool that makes it easy for technical and non-technical developers to get habituated with the interface and then perform their project testing tasks.

About SoapUI:

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding PractiTest:

• The owner of SoapUI is Smartbear Software, originally founded by Eviware Software.
• The current CEO is Frank Roe.
• The head office is located in Massachusetts, United States.
• Founded in 2005.
• Comprises a maximum of 30 employees.

Key Features:

Graphical Interface: SoapUI supplies their fellow developers with a graphical interface feature that makes it easy to organize and analyze each test case very effectively. The user can view the test results and set up more test cases in that interface with very easy control

Advanced Test Cases: SoapUI also includes advanced test cases such as complex API tests, data-driven tests, scripting, and many more. The developers can easily script these different test cases and simulate them to set out the debugs.

Integration techniques: To increase testing efficiency with no lags, SoapUI supports various third-party tools such as JIRA, Jenkins, and Git to ensure faster access. Moreover, it also supports API formats, for example, WSDL, Swagger, and RAML.

Automation: SoapUI provides the user with automation settings to save time and effort. Additionally, it includes continuous integration techniques and delivery to make automation even faster.

Data-Driven Analogy: The developers can input various parameters on the API testing to create an analogy of the data-driven feature.

SoapUI vs. Insomnia:

When it comes to comparing SoapUI and Insomnia, we think that SoapUI might just win the race. As both are API development tools, SoapUI additionally focuses on RestAPIs.

Furthermore, it has some other features like creating advanced test cases, and a graphical user interface that is both friendly and easy to observe the test data. On the other hand, Insomnia also offers many amazing features, but it requires complex programming language for customization.

The interface is also user-friendly, but not as good as SoapUI. Last but not least, SoapUI is an open-source API development tool that Insomnia lacks. Though our decision is biased over SoapUI, choosing a tool is solely based on the project requirement of the team.

Therefore, focus on every parameter before making a final decision!

Pros:

•   Unlike many tools, SoapUI is also a comprehensive API testing tool for software or mobile applications.
•   This particular tool is very easy to use.
•   It includes continuous integration and development techniques.
•   It acts as an open-source tool for developers.
• The interface is user-friendly which is easy to learn for non-technical users.

Cons:

• The community support may  not be satisfactory.
• The test runs may show significant lags sometime

Pricing

Try SoapUI

Our review of SoapUI:

As for usage, SoapUI is the perfect tool for API testing. No matter what type of application you choose, the test cases will deliver the valid results of two or three different systems to account for compatibility.

The most important part is that the tool is open-source which gives the non-technical users the opportunity to learn the functionality and the development of test cases. As for the technical users, the interface is really simple to use.

Additionally, the graphical interface gives a cool outlook on the test results and it helps greatly during the analysis. But, the community support is not top-notch and there seem to be rare glitches during the simulations.

Furthermore, the documentation will also need certain improvements to attract more developers for the API testing. For someone who’s looking for a user-friendly interface API testing tool, we vouch for them SoapUI.

Read More: Alternatives to SoupUI

Katalon

Katalon is the best option as the Insomnia substitute if you want to have API testing along with other testing. This comprehensive testing tool includes desktop, mobile, API, and website applications.

 Katalon offers a far more user-friendly interface with programming languages like Java, Groovy, or Python. Additionally, if any user has zero knowledge of programming, they can easily write test cases from the built-in keywords from Katalon’s libraries.

 Regarding testing, Katalon offers a variety of sorts, including functional testing, regression testing, mobile testing, and others. These different variants in testing helped Katalon to gain popularity among many software developers in the field of automation testing.

About Katalon:

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding Katalon:

• The founder of Katalon is Vu Lam
• The co-founder of Katalon is Uy Tran.
• The current CEO is Vu Lam.
• The head office is located in Atlanta, Georgia, and Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
• Founded in 2015.
• Comprises a maximum of 500 employees.

Key Features:

Website testing: Katalon, a flexible testing tool, provides web testing across a range of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. You can implement the testing methods on these browsers both by writing the codes or using the libraries as well.

Mobile testing: Katalon also has the liberty to do mobile application testing. This allows the user to develop the application on any third-party tools and then run the tests on Katalon.

API testing: Katalon’s ability to do API testing is its most intriguing feature. Moreover, it enables assertions, data-driven testing, and most importantly, validates the API response.

Desktop testing: It is supported by Katalon on operating systems including Windows and macOS. It additionally helps the users to run website application testing also.

Test Management: Katalon also offers various types of test management techniques such as a test recorder, script editor, and many integration tools that include JIRA, and TestRail as well.

Katalon vs. Insomnia:

Katalon is a tool that is designed to serve every purpose that a software developer can thrive for. For example, Katalon can perform all sorts of testing such as mobile, website, desktop applications, and many more.

On the other hand, Insomnia is built to focus on testing and debugging APIs. Therefore, the motive of the two testing tools is entirely different. Though the API testing part of Katalon needs improvement, we’ll recommend using Insomnia for API development. Otherwise, Katalon it is!

Pros:

•   The interface is user-friendly.
•   To operate Katalon, the user doesn’t have to be an expert in coding.
•   It’s a cloud-based platform that enables one to work from a remote location.
•  Integration tools like JIRA and TestRail increase testing efficiency.

Cons:

•  It doesn’t focus much on the API development tool.

Pricing

Try Katalon

Our review of Katalon:

The most intriguing part about Katalon is that it includes advanced test cases like test recordings, playback options, and many more. Additionally, being a cloud-based platform takes off more burden.

But, the API development tool feature that is included with Katalon needs some modifications. If this part gets a focus, we’re not seeing anyone to top Katalon.

Read More: Katalon Alternatives For App Testing

Testsigma

Though Testsigma is new to the application testing field, it has already attracted many developers since its inauguration. It’s a machine learning process that powers the whole system, allowing users to efficiently conduct web or application testing.

One advantage of using Testsigma is that the developers don’t need any programming knowledge while carrying out the automaton tests. Because of this, non-technical users can easily build an interface and execute each test for their specific applications.

Testsigma also provides sophisticated options for people with extensive coding skills to create custom codes for their testing tasks. As you can see, it succeeds in creating a platform that is user-friendly for everyone. There’s a graphical representation of every result of the testing which enables the user to sort out the problems and solve them without any hassle.

About Testsigma:

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding Testsigma:

• The founder and CEO of Testsigma is Rukmangada Kandyala.
• The head offices are located in California, USA, and Bangalore, India.
• Founded in 2018.
• Comprises a maximum of 200 employees.

Key Features:

Test automation: As mentioned earlier, Testsigma doesn’t require any programming language skills to operate. Hence, implementing a testing system is easy. With that being said, this tool supports varieties of testing grounds such as desktop, mobile, APIs, or website applications.

Test reporting: Testsigma provides detailed report testing information. Such reports include logs and screenshots of unsuccessful tests, allowing the user to identify the precise issue and take the appropriate action as necessary.

Integration techniques: For the integration techniques, Testsigma also supports several third-party technologies including JIRA, Selenium, and Jenkins. These steps assist the user in increasing the effectiveness of application testing, and hence the efficiency.

Testsigma vs. Insomnia:

Both Testsigma and Insomnia consist of API testing. But, if we were to make a choice, Testsigma includes more features like website, mobile, or desktop application testing.

On the other hand, Insomnia is only dedicated to APIs. Therefore, developers who need to focus on API testing projects, can, without a doubt, choose Insomnia. For other versatile application tests, Testsigma will be a perfect choice.

Pros:

•   The interface is user-friendly.
•   The test cases don’t require any special programming language knowledge.
• It includes various integration techniques.

Cons:

•   The subscription packages are expensive.

Pricing

Try Testsigma

Our review of Testsigma:

As Testsigma doesn’t require the special skill of coding to implement the test cases, it quickly gained popularity among many developers. Thanks to its user-friendly interface, the streak goes on.

Apart from their excellent customer service, the test cases sometimes take longer time to implement which is a time-consuming issue. Our suggestion to the Testsigma developers is to try to fix the issue as soon as possible. Additionally, the subscription packages are also hard to afford for everybody.

Testim

Are you looking for a preferred tool for your web application testing? Well, here we’re with the dedicated testing tool for websites- Testim. It includes various features such as cross-browser testing, and AI-powered testing to help the developers create website applications that are suitable for every platform.

Along with the combination of all the tests, Testim helps to produce the best testing results that enable the developers to analyze the test results and come up with the best solution for their websites.

The interface is very easy to use and the tool is suitable for both technical and non-technical users.

About Testim:

The list below will show all the necessary information regarding PractiTest:

• The founders of PractiTest are Joel Montvelisky and Yaniv Iny.
• Current CEO is Joel Montvelisky.
• The head office is located in Israel, but there are some offices also located in the United States and the United Kingdom.
• Founded in 2008.
• Comprises a maximum of 50 employees.

Key features:

Test Recording: This feature allows the developers to interact with the website applications and the tool will generate the test cases automatically. This eases up the work of writing lines of code which is beneficial for amateur programmers.

Cross-browser testing: Websites need to run on different types of browsers. Testim’s cross-browser testing feature will allow you to test your website application on different browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and many more. Developers can also run the test on multiple browsers to speed up the testing procedure.

AI Testing: This is a cool feature included in Testim. It uses machine learning to enhance the test runs and identify different patterns within the results. This helps the user to lower the test run maintenance time and generates a more organized test result that will need fixing.

Integration techniques: Testim also includes various integrations like Gira, Slack, GitHub, and many more to improve testing efficiency. This tool provides in-depth data and analytics to assist the developer’s team in monitoring their testing progress and locating potential improvement areas.

Continuous testing: Testim also includes CI/CD tools associated with integrated tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, and TravisCI to account for continuous testing. This ensures that new changes in the system don’t break the functionality due to bugs.

Ratings and Reviews: G2 (4.6 / 5, 48 reviews), Capterra (4.7 / 5, 44 reviews).

Testim vs. Insomnia:

The purpose of Testim and Insomnia are somewhat different. Testim is a dedicated website application testing tool that specializes in cross-browser testing, AI testing, test recordings, and many more.

On the other hand, Insomnia is an API development testing tool that enables requesting API documentation, debugging APIs, and many more. But, in the case of interface, both tools are user-friendly. So, if you require a tool for efficient testing of website applications, Testim will be a wise choice.

In terms of API testing, you can choose Insomnia or go with other alternatives as well.

Pros:

•   The interface is easy to use.
•   AI testing saves a lot of time for the developers while executing the test results.
•   Powerful integration techniques (also includes continuous integration techniques).
•   Cross-browser testing allows it to be compatible with multiple browsers.
• The test recordings enable easy implementation for non-technical users.

Cons:

•   The subscription packages are a bit costly.

Pricing

Try Testim

Our review of Testim:

In terms of the performance of the Testim tool, the results and reviews are top-notch. The cross-browser testing feature helps developers to prepare their applications on multiple browsers.

Additionally, AI testing saves a lot of time. But, the image verification might be a bit slow on this tool which will need certain fixes or modifications. Other than that, this tool is a must-try for website developers.

Frequently Asked Questions – FAQs

What is the best alternative to Insomnia?

As insomnia is dedicated to the API testing tool, several other tools even provide greater service than Insomnia.

If we need to mention one, then it has to be SoapUI, which is a comprehensive API development tool with features like data-driven technology, automation testing, graphical interfaces, and many more.

What is the cheapest API testing tool?

The cheapest API testing tools which can also be a good alternative to Insomnia are as follows:

•   Postman
•   Testim
•  JMeter

Conclusion

Our comparison was based on the user-friendly interface and the number of features each tool has to offer. Additionally, mobile, API, desktop, or website application testing features are necessary for software developers for their projects.

Hence, for API testing, SoapUI will be a better choice as it’s a comprehensive API testing tool. As for versatility, Katalon will be another one to consider.

Try More Read

Best alternatives to Puppeteer

Top Competitors Browsershots 

Competitors To TestRail

The post We Tried 5 Best Insomnia Alternatives  [In-Depth Comparison 2024] appeared first on Software Testing Stuff.

Smoke testing is a technique used in software testing to check whether the primary features of an application are working correctly or not. It is a preliminary test that is performed to ensure that the critical functionalities of the software are functioning correctly before proceeding with further testing. We will learn about the sanity test vs the smoke test later. But first, let us look into the advantages.

Advantages of Smoke Testing

The following are the advantages of Smoke Testing:

• Early Detection of Issues: Smoke Testing helps in identifying any significant issues in the application at an early stage, thereby enabling the development team to fix them before the software is released.
• Cost-effective: Smoke testing is a cost-effective technique as it can be performed with minimal resources and in a short time.
• Time-Saving: By detecting the major issues at an early stage, it saves a lot of time for the development team in fixing them.
• Improved Quality: By performing smoke testing, the quality of the software is improved as it ensures that the critical features are working correctly.

Disadvantages of Smoke Testing

The following are the disadvantages of Smoke Testing:

• Limited Scope: Smoke testing has a limited scope as it only tests the primary features of the application.
• Incomplete Testing: Since smoke testing is performed at the early stage of the software development life cycle, it may not be possible to test all the features of the application.
• False Sense of Security: Smoke testing may provide a false sense of security to the development team as it only tests the primary features of the application.

Tools for automating Smoke Testing:

The following are the tools for automating Smoke Testing:

• Selenium: Selenium is an open-source tool used for automating web applications. It supports various programming languages, including Java, C#, Python, and Ruby.
• TestComplete: TestComplete is a commercial tool used for automating desktop, web, and mobile applications. It supports various scripting languages, including JavaScript, Python, and VBScript.
• Appium: Appium is an open-source tool used for automating mobile applications. It supports various platforms, including Android and iOS.
• Katalon Studio: Katalon Studio is a free tool used for automating web, mobile, and API testing. It supports various scripting languages, including Groovy and Java.

Smoke testing is a useful technique used in software testing to ensure that the critical features of the application are working correctly. Although it has its limitations, it is still an essential test that needs to be performed before proceeding with further testing. Automating smoke testing can save a lot of time and resources, and the tools mentioned above can help in achieving this.

Smoke Testing Example

Let’s assume that a software development team is working on a new e-commerce website. Before proceeding with further testing, the team performs a smoke test to ensure that the primary functionalities of the website are working correctly.

The smoke test includes the following:

1. Launching the website: The team will launch the website and check if the homepage is loading correctly.
2. Navigation: The team will check if the navigation links on the homepage are working correctly and redirecting the user to the intended pages.
3. Search functionality: The team will perform a search for a product and check if the search results are displayed correctly.
4. Add to cart: The team will add a product to the cart and check if the product is added successfully.
5. Checkout: The team will proceed to the checkout page and check if the checkout process is working correctly.

If any of the above tests fail, the team will report the issues to the development team for further investigation and fixing. Performing a smoke test can help the development team identify critical issues at an early stage, thus saving time and resources.

What is Sanity Testing?

In software testing, Sanity Testing is a type of testing that is performed after a software build to ensure that the new changes or bug fixes made to the application have not impacted the existing functionality of the system. This testing is also known as a subset of regression testing and is primarily used to validate the critical functionalities of the software.

Advantages of Sanity Testing

1. Quick Testing: Sanity Testing is a quick way of testing software changes, as it is a focused test on a specific part of the system. It helps testers identify if the changes made are working as expected or not.
2. Cost-Effective: As Sanity Testing is a type of testing that focuses on only the critical functionalities, it saves time and resources in the testing process. It helps reduce the cost of testing and ensures the quality of the software.
3. Time-saving: As Sanity Testing is a quick way of testing, it saves time for testers and developers by identifying issues early in the development process. This helps in reducing the time to market the software.

Disadvantages of Sanity Testing

1. Limited Scope: Sanity Testing is a type of testing that is only focused on critical functionalities of the system. This limits the scope of testing and may not cover all the possible scenarios of the software.
2. Incomplete Testing: As Sanity Testing is a subset of regression testing, it may not cover all the test cases that need to be executed. This may result in incomplete testing and the possibility of issues being missed.

Tools for automating Sanity Testing

1. Selenium: Selenium is an open-source tool used for automating web applications. It supports different programming languages and can be integrated with various testing frameworks.
2. TestNG: TestNG is a testing framework that supports both unit and integration testing. It can be integrated with Selenium to automate web applications.
3. Jenkins: Jenkins is a continuous integration tool that can be used to automate Sanity Testing. It allows the creation of automated test scripts and the scheduling of them to run at specific intervals.

Sanity Testing Example

Suppose a software application has a login functionality, and the developers have made some changes to the login page. In such a scenario, Sanity Testing can be performed to ensure that the changes made have not impacted the existing login functionality.

The tester would only focus on the critical functionalities of the login page, such as entering a valid username and password, and verifying that the user is successfully logged in. If the login functionality works fine, then the changes made to the login page are considered to be working correctly.

If any issue is found, then the changes made to the login page are considered to be failed, and the development team is informed to fix the issue before proceeding with further testing. Let us now look into the sanity test vs smoke test.

Sanity Test Vs Smoke Test

Smoke Testing and Sanity Testing are two types of testing performed during the software testing process to ensure that the software is ready for further testing. Although both tests are performed before the actual testing process, they are different from each other in terms of their objectives, scope, and timing.

Here is a table that outlines the differences between Smoke and Sanity Testing:

Now, you have learned the difference between Smoke and Sanity Testing. Smoke Testing and Sanity Testing are both important types of testing in software testing.

Smoke Testing checks if the software build is stable enough for further testing, while Sanity Testing ensures that the critical functionalities of the software are working as expected.

Knowing the differences between the two tests can help testers choose the appropriate test type and execute it at the right time to ensure the quality of the software.

Wrapping Up

Smoke testing and sanity testing is preliminary testing techniques in software testing used before proceeding with further testing. They have advantages like early detection of issues, cost-effectiveness, time-saving, etc followed by limitations, such as limited scope, incomplete testing, and providing a false sense of security. 

Here, we have also learned about testing tools like Selenium, TestComplete, Appium, and Katalon Studio. We have also learned about the smoke test vs regression test and sanity test vs smoke test, and smoke testing and sanity testing examples. So, next time you face geeky questions about this, you know you can answer them for sure!

The post Difference Between Smoke and Sanity Testing: Learn with examples! appeared first on Software Testing Stuff.